Next Blog

  Friday, June 16, 2006

I'm Conflicted!

I love gadgets. Anyone who knows me can attest to that. Every day I read the gadget blogs to see what's new, and what's on its way. The future can't happen fast enough, if you ask me. Where's my jetpack? Where's my flying car?

On the other hand (why is there always an other hand?) I know that I can't own all the cool gadgets. I can't afford it, and even if I could, where would I put everything? I've also been burned before. Some gadgets are just fads, so it's not worth jumping on every gadget bandwagon. Remember Apple's Newton? Sony Betamax? Laserdiscs? Fortunately, I didn't buy any of those, because they're all now obsolete.

So what I do is observe and see which gadgets seem worthwhile, which ones are here to stay. It took a long time for me to switch from MS-DOS to Windows. I thought a mouse with a scrollwheel was a gimmick, until I used somebody else's and realized that they were actually very handy.

Now we have HDTV. Is it worth it to switch? And if you do, what kind of DVD player do you get? HD DVD or Blu-Ray? Personally, I hate all things Sony, so I'd probably avoid Blu-Ray. But I can't afford it anyway.

When we go shopping, I like to look at the HDTVs. I couldn't believe how expensive they were, especially since the image was so crappy. Until now.

When I go into the stores now, the images look great. Most of the stores, anyway. The images are sharp, and bright, and not full of glitches and artifacts. It turns out that the stores used to display their HDTVs with bad input. They'd hook up a whole bunch of TVs to a single DVD player, splitting the signal so much that it looked bad, especially since they're displaying a low-res signal on high-def TVs. It's like putting a Volkswagon motor in a Corvette. It may seem like a hot car, but it won't run well. No matter how good an HDTV is, it won't look as good as a high-def TV can without a high-def signal.

The stores finally caught on. Now they're showing their high-def TVs with high-def signals, and what a difference!

The funny thing is, they've started taking older TV shows and running them in high def. Shows like Philly, The Agency, Boomtown, The Equalizer.

How can they run these old shows in high def that were filmed before there was high def? What magic is this?

The trick is in the word filmed. Quality shows are recorded on film, like a movie. Film captures images in very high definition. Higher than a high-def TV. Cheap shows are recorded on videotape. You've heard me rant about video before. It only captures a couple hundred lines of resolution. No matter how good the video enhancement you see on CSI and other shows, you can't get more information out of a videotape than was originally recorded. You can't take a standard definition videotape and all of a sudden pull out high def from it. But you can take an old show on film, and play it in high def. The quality shows that spent more up front on a good recording are now seeing new life and getting more money. The cheap shows are still cheap.

You get what you pay for.


Blog Tag: Opinion

4 Comments:

At 6/17/2006 11:59 AM, Blogger Candace said...

Dear Conflicted in Bend

It quite likely comes down to a matter of your (Connie and you) priorities. Where do you wish to invest your money? What will bring you the most pleasure and most enrich the quality of your lives as you see it (not as others or the market sees it)?

Rusty and I (as you know) have a large, older RCA TV, which was given to us as a gift. We thought that the picture quality was awful... grainy, wavy, poorly defined.

Then, we switched to satellite TV. We thought that we had gone to TV heaven! For us, it was as if we had switched to HDTV without the hefty investment.

For us, it's a no brainer. We can easily make do with and enjoy what we have. We also know that there would be a domino effect with the purchase of an HDTV, since we would next be sucked in by digital surround sound and who knows what else.

Admittedly, since we (as you also know) live in a small house, there is definitely the temptation to have a TV hanging on a wall as opposed to taking up precious floor space, but...

As much as we might enjoy relaxing in front of the TV and watching our favorite shows, what most enriches and bring joy to our lives comes from nature, exploring the outdoors in a wilderness setting.

Hence, we are more likely to invest our money in backpacking, hiking, kayaking, scuba diving, camping and similar equipment.

Even then, it's tough. Fix up our cozy, old house or purchase more toys?

I think that Heinlein, in his Notebooks of Lazarus Long, sums it up best.

   "Budget the luxuries first!"

As for the technical side of your dilemma, my geekdom definitely has its limits. :)

Ever so helpful and opinionated,

Mostly Satisfied in Valley Village

 
At 6/17/2006 6:28 PM, Blogger Michelle said...

I agree, you do get what you pay for.

 
At 6/18/2006 8:05 PM, Blogger Melissa said...

With all due respect, I must disagree that you get what you pay for. Recently, I bought some fish and it never made it home with me. The next customer in line probably ended up with it. Is that the kind of thing you were talking about? :)

 
At 6/18/2006 11:30 PM, Blogger dkgoodman said...

Thanks, Candace. Sage advice. :)

Melissa, you got what you paid for, you just didn't get it home. Think of it as charity. ;)

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home